VOORHEESVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

65

12%

LEVEL 2

187

35%

LEVEL 3

175

33%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

339
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

143

27%

LEVEL 3

175

33%

LEVEL 4

164

31%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

142
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

92

35%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

83

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

83

31%

LEVEL 4

56

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

167
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

81

30%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

261
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

175

36%

LEVEL 3

160

33%

LEVEL 4

101

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

313
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

130

27%

LEVEL 3

165

34%

LEVEL 4

148

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

171

36%

LEVEL 4

102

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

325
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

15

3%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

164

35%

LEVEL 4

161

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

35

59%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

30

47%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

273
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

171

34%

LEVEL 3

168

34%

LEVEL 4

105

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

321
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

122

26%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

164

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

13

35%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

18

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.