Skip to Content
Main content

BERNE-KNOX-WESTERLO CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

185

45%

LEVEL 2

157

38%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

146

44%

LEVEL 2

107

32%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

81

41%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

69

42%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

104

49%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

77

45%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

177

44%

LEVEL 2

155

39%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

139

43%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

131

37%

LEVEL 2

154

44%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

102

36%

LEVEL 2

103

36%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

54

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

44

90%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

96

37%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

69

38%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

89

60%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

77

51%

LEVEL 2

52

34%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.