WELLSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

164

30%

LEVEL 2

246

45%

LEVEL 3

101

19%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

177

33%

LEVEL 2

216

40%

LEVEL 3

101

19%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

81

29%

LEVEL 2

128

47%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

95

35%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

60

22%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

118

44%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

82

31%

LEVEL 2

120

45%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

125
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

153

30%

LEVEL 2

234

46%

LEVEL 3

93

18%

LEVEL 4

32

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

161

32%

LEVEL 2

201

40%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

97

21%

LEVEL 2

227

50%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

116

25%

LEVEL 2

198

43%

LEVEL 3

98

21%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

67

76%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

61

74%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

134

47%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

106

41%

LEVEL 2

112

43%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

136

44%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.