MILLS POND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

40

19%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

93

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

40

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

56

38%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

33

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

53

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

36

19%

LEVEL 3

61

32%

LEVEL 4

87

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

87

35%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

30

15%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

90

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

16

46%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

60

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

92

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.