Skip to Content
Main content

BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

156

37%

LEVEL 2

180

42%

LEVEL 3

81

19%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

125

30%

LEVEL 2

173

41%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

53

27%

LEVEL 2

81

42%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

85

38%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

72

32%

LEVEL 2

92

41%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

79
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

151

38%

LEVEL 2

165

42%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

106
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

119

30%

LEVEL 2

167

43%

LEVEL 3

75

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

3

12%

LEVEL 2

14

56%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

121

33%

LEVEL 2

161

44%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

90

25%

LEVEL 2

157

44%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

35

58%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

35

60%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

148

38%

LEVEL 2

166

42%

LEVEL 3

71

18%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

116

31%

LEVEL 2

155

42%

LEVEL 3

75

20%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.