Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST EAST NY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

180

40%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

74

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

147

32%

LEVEL 3

203

44%

LEVEL 4

63

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

102

40%

LEVEL 3

80

32%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

156
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

116

45%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

78

40%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

87

42%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

182
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

154

40%

LEVEL 3

117

30%

LEVEL 4

65

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

219
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

170

43%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

29

45%

LEVEL 4

12

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

168

39%

LEVEL 3

137

32%

LEVEL 4

72

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

197

47%

LEVEL 4

60

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

17

34%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

40

51%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

43

55%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

140

38%

LEVEL 3

122

33%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

126

33%

LEVEL 3

160

41%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.