ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

60

21%

LEVEL 2

148

52%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

116

46%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

92

54%

LEVEL 3

35

21%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

36

24%

LEVEL 2

69

46%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

56

48%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

47

47%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

12

38%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

14

56%

LEVEL 4

6

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

115

56%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

42

24%

LEVEL 2

89

52%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

12

34%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

18

47%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

142

52%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

110

48%

LEVEL 3

57

25%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

14

11%

LEVEL 2

63

51%

LEVEL 3

39

32%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

42

41%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

85

52%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

74

50%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.