Skip to Content
Main content

UNCOMMON BED-STUY EAST CS NYC GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the NYSED website. This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

126

47%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

103

37%

LEVEL 4

37

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

65

48%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

61

41%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

61

46%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

52

39%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

93
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

34

14%

LEVEL 2

115

48%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

123
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

96

40%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

16

48%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

7

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

112

46%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

96

39%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

14

50%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

140
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

41

46%

LEVEL 3

34

38%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

20

43%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

25

14%

LEVEL 2

85

47%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.