SENECA COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,686

LEVEL 1

634

38%

LEVEL 2

601

36%

LEVEL 3

330

20%

LEVEL 4

121

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

360
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,040

LEVEL 1

327

31%

LEVEL 2

353

34%

LEVEL 3

245

24%

LEVEL 4

115

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

230
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 825

LEVEL 1

292

35%

LEVEL 2

303

37%

LEVEL 3

174

21%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

152

30%

LEVEL 2

168

34%

LEVEL 3

124

25%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

221
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 861

LEVEL 1

342

40%

LEVEL 2

298

35%

LEVEL 3

156

18%

LEVEL 4

65

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

175

32%

LEVEL 2

185

34%

LEVEL 3

121

22%

LEVEL 4

58

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

19

43%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

8

21%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

413
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,504

LEVEL 1

543

36%

LEVEL 2

548

36%

LEVEL 3

301

20%

LEVEL 4

112

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

324
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

271

30%

LEVEL 2

318

35%

LEVEL 3

221

24%

LEVEL 4

103

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

35

58%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

32

54%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

11

19%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

18

45%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

445
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,417

LEVEL 1

417

29%

LEVEL 2

555

39%

LEVEL 3

325

23%

LEVEL 4

120

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

355
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 872

LEVEL 1

184

21%

LEVEL 2

333

38%

LEVEL 3

240

28%

LEVEL 4

115

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

217

81%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

5

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

143

85%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

287
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 838

LEVEL 1

237

28%

LEVEL 2

314

37%

LEVEL 3

203

24%

LEVEL 4

84

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

240
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

119

23%

LEVEL 2

161

31%

LEVEL 3

160

31%

LEVEL 4

80

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 848

LEVEL 1

397

47%

LEVEL 2

287

34%

LEVEL 3

127

15%

LEVEL 4

37

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

208

40%

LEVEL 2

192

37%

LEVEL 3

85

16%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.