WYOMING COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

623
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,760

LEVEL 1

462

26%

LEVEL 2

675

38%

LEVEL 3

417

24%

LEVEL 4

206

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

580
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,486

LEVEL 1

346

23%

LEVEL 2

560

38%

LEVEL 3

378

25%

LEVEL 4

202

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

320
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 860

LEVEL 1

229

27%

LEVEL 2

311

36%

LEVEL 3

212

25%

LEVEL 4

108

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

304
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 731

LEVEL 1

159

22%

LEVEL 2

268

37%

LEVEL 3

204

28%

LEVEL 4

100

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

303
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 900

LEVEL 1

233

26%

LEVEL 2

364

40%

LEVEL 3

205

23%

LEVEL 4

98

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

276
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 755

LEVEL 1

187

25%

LEVEL 2

292

39%

LEVEL 3

174

23%

LEVEL 4

102

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

6

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

603
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,679

LEVEL 1

436

26%

LEVEL 2

640

38%

LEVEL 3

406

24%

LEVEL 4

197

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

557
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,407

LEVEL 1

318

23%

LEVEL 2

532

38%

LEVEL 3

366

26%

LEVEL 4

191

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

20

53%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

16

40%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

599
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,527

LEVEL 1

310

20%

LEVEL 2

618

40%

LEVEL 3

399

26%

LEVEL 4

200

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

565
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,289

LEVEL 1

219

17%

LEVEL 2

505

39%

LEVEL 3

369

29%

LEVEL 4

196

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

152

65%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

127

64%

LEVEL 2

55

28%

LEVEL 3

9

5%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

579
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,478

LEVEL 1

340

23%

LEVEL 2

559

38%

LEVEL 3

377

26%

LEVEL 4

202

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

429
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,026

LEVEL 1

212

21%

LEVEL 2

385

38%

LEVEL 3

270

26%

LEVEL 4

159

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

412
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 874

LEVEL 1

146

17%

LEVEL 2

316

36%

LEVEL 3

264

30%

LEVEL 4

148

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 734

LEVEL 1

250

34%

LEVEL 2

290

40%

LEVEL 3

147

20%

LEVEL 4

47

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

200

33%

LEVEL 2

244

40%

LEVEL 3

114

19%

LEVEL 4

54

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.