Skip to Content
Main content

AVON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

94

21%

LEVEL 2

149

33%

LEVEL 3

145

33%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

73

36%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

43

36%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

52

33%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

86

21%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

8

57%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

72

17%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

144

34%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

88

34%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

22

79%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

20

91%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

50

38%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

26

33%

LEVEL 3

18

23%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.