Skip to Content
Main content

DANSVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 662

LEVEL 1

184

28%

LEVEL 2

256

39%

LEVEL 3

159

24%

LEVEL 4

63

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

120

27%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

96

28%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

78

23%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

67

29%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

53

25%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 619

LEVEL 1

162

26%

LEVEL 2

241

39%

LEVEL 3

156

25%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

106

26%

LEVEL 2

149

36%

LEVEL 3

108

26%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

128

22%

LEVEL 2

233

41%

LEVEL 3

149

26%

LEVEL 4

62

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

51

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

56

62%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

50

74%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

222
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

180

27%

LEVEL 2

254

39%

LEVEL 3

159

24%

LEVEL 4

63

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

164
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

116

26%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

113

26%

LEVEL 4

51

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

131

36%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.