Skip to Content
Main content

EAST BLOOMFIELD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

98

26%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

38

22%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

37

30%

LEVEL 2

37

30%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

40

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

23

17%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

43

32%

LEVEL 4

32

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

81

23%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

76

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

74

33%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

47

85%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

28

82%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

38

15%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

41

25%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

42

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

47

42%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.