Skip to Content
Main content

HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

191

40%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

82

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

54

38%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

39

32%

LEVEL 3

46

38%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

179

40%

LEVEL 3

145

33%

LEVEL 4

78

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

80

33%

LEVEL 3

95

40%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

14

3%

LEVEL 2

170

41%

LEVEL 3

149

36%

LEVEL 4

81

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

97

41%

LEVEL 4

51

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

33

54%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

167

40%

LEVEL 3

142

34%

LEVEL 4

77

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

79

34%

LEVEL 3

92

39%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.