Skip to Content
Main content

HONEOYE FALLS-LIMA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

497
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 975

LEVEL 1

143

15%

LEVEL 2

335

34%

LEVEL 3

312

32%

LEVEL 4

185

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

373
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

66

11%

LEVEL 2

149

25%

LEVEL 3

207

35%

LEVEL 4

166

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

232
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

71

15%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

156

33%

LEVEL 4

76

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

105

37%

LEVEL 4

69

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

265
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

72

14%

LEVEL 2

169

33%

LEVEL 3

156

31%

LEVEL 4

109

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

199
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

97

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

469
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 913

LEVEL 1

132

14%

LEVEL 2

312

34%

LEVEL 3

298

33%

LEVEL 4

171

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

345
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

137

25%

LEVEL 3

191

36%

LEVEL 4

154

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

10

48%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

8

53%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

485
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 851

LEVEL 1

70

8%

LEVEL 2

296

35%

LEVEL 3

301

35%

LEVEL 4

184

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

32

6%

LEVEL 2

137

26%

LEVEL 3

201

38%

LEVEL 4

164

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

73

59%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

34

63%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

466
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 846

LEVEL 1

89

11%

LEVEL 2

291

34%

LEVEL 3

291

34%

LEVEL 4

175

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

344
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

130

25%

LEVEL 3

190

37%

LEVEL 4

154

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

54

42%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

23

32%

LEVEL 2

19

27%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.