Skip to Content
Main content

COBBLES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

18

8%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

138

62%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

23

12%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

100

53%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

63

62%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

27

29%

LEVEL 4

47

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

8%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

75

62%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

53

55%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

8

73%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

171
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

119

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

87

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

7%

LEVEL 3

61

29%

LEVEL 4

137

64%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

100

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

126

65%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

16

10%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

88

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

12

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.