Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

74

17%

LEVEL 2

136

31%

LEVEL 3

158

37%

LEVEL 4

64

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

99

20%

LEVEL 2

160

33%

LEVEL 3

158

33%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

37

18%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

72

34%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

86

39%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

49

23%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

126
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

88

36%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

126
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

87

33%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

112

31%

LEVEL 3

146

40%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

28

41%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

43

46%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

216
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

153

38%

LEVEL 4

63

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

219
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

86

19%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

13

39%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

12

44%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

208
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

62

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

145

32%

LEVEL 4

67

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.