Skip to Content
Main content

NEW EXPLORATIONS SCI, TECH & MATH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

560
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

27

5%

LEVEL 3

126

21%

LEVEL 4

434

74%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

565
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 586

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

3%

LEVEL 3

91

16%

LEVEL 4

474

81%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

311
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

15

5%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

237

72%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

294
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

242

80%

MALE

PROFICIENT

249
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

12

5%

LEVEL 3

52

20%

LEVEL 4

197

75%

MALE

PROFICIENT

271
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

11

4%

LEVEL 3

39

14%

LEVEL 4

232

82%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

6

86%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

15

83%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

152
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

1%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

131

85%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

165
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

155

93%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

315
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

247

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

292
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

2%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

247

83%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

17

31%

LEVEL 4

25

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

21

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

18

41%

LEVEL 4

23

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

46
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

32

65%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

482
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

4%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

379

75%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

487
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

3%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

414

82%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

55

64%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

18

22%

LEVEL 4

60

72%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.