Skip to Content
Main content

MLK JR HIGH TECH & COMPUTER MAGNE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

226

74%

LEVEL 2

67

22%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

199

70%

LEVEL 2

72

25%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

114

75%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

95

70%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

112

72%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

104

71%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

105

81%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

95

74%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

106

68%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

86

64%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

186

70%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

167

68%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

40

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

32

82%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

180

72%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

165

68%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

46

81%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

34

83%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

28

61%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

198

76%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

6

2%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

182

71%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

10

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.