Skip to Content
Main content

PEARLS HAWTHORNE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

412
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 663

LEVEL 1

40

6%

LEVEL 2

211

32%

LEVEL 3

261

39%

LEVEL 4

151

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

404
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

124

22%

LEVEL 3

213

38%

LEVEL 4

191

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

234
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

151

40%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

121

39%

LEVEL 4

102

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

178
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

110

39%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

181
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

89

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

108
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

17%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

58

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

111
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

71

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

62

40%

LEVEL 4

40

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

53

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

41

46%

LEVEL 3

35

39%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

17

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

141
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

104

40%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

133
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

88

41%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

403
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 639

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

199

31%

LEVEL 3

253

40%

LEVEL 4

150

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

114

21%

LEVEL 3

205

38%

LEVEL 4

188

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

8

33%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

263
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

98

26%

LEVEL 3

154

41%

LEVEL 4

109

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

246
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

54

17%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

134

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

101

40%

LEVEL 4

57

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.