Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 30 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

114

32%

LEVEL 2

140

40%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

87

31%

LEVEL 2

123

44%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

61

36%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

45

33%

LEVEL 2

59

43%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

53

28%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

42

29%

LEVEL 2

64

44%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

5

16%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

41

36%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

20

23%

LEVEL 2

40

46%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

20

53%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

11

38%

LEVEL 2

14

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

66

42%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

47

37%

LEVEL 2

53

42%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

104

31%

LEVEL 2

136

40%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

80

30%

LEVEL 2

120

45%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

104

31%

LEVEL 2

135

40%

LEVEL 3

74

22%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

118

45%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

10

63%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

40

37%

LEVEL 3

31

29%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

20

21%

LEVEL 2

45

48%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

100

40%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

67

36%

LEVEL 2

78

42%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.