Skip to Content
Main content

CASIMIR PULASKI SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

86

23%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

76

30%

LEVEL 2

92

37%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

31

29%

LEVEL 2

45

42%

LEVEL 3

22

20%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

71

35%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

12

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

31

23%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

38

28%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

30

38%

LEVEL 3

27

34%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

43

31%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

30

33%

LEVEL 2

38

42%

LEVEL 3

17

19%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

88

42%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

34

71%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

35

83%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

100

28%

LEVEL 2

119

33%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

73

30%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

34

37%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

80

38%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.