Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 16 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

161

47%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

185

47%

LEVEL 2

123

31%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

81

49%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

80

44%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

80

46%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

105

50%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

35

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

14

33%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

19

42%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

48

58%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

13

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

52

49%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

95

49%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

110

37%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

57

19%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

64

94%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

75

82%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

85
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

141

46%

LEVEL 2

81

26%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

83
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

158

45%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

36

41%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

125

50%

LEVEL 2

64

25%

LEVEL 3

47

19%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

164

50%

LEVEL 2

98

30%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.