Skip to Content
Main content

EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS MICROSOCIETY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

183

48%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

149

40%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

68

18%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

94

45%

LEVEL 2

70

33%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

79

42%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

89

52%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

24

14%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

70

38%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

36

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

6

24%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

70
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

160

47%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

55

16%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

154

45%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

123

37%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

29

69%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

26

70%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

86

35%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

80
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

97

73%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

78

68%

LEVEL 2

22

19%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

27

56%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

156

47%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

146

40%

LEVEL 2

124

34%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.