Skip to Content
Main content

ROBERT C DODSON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

274

54%

LEVEL 2

166

32%

LEVEL 3

61

12%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 548

LEVEL 1

281

51%

LEVEL 2

178

32%

LEVEL 3

72

13%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

119

50%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

138

52%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

31

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

155

57%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

32

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

143

51%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

14

42%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

15

47%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

254

56%

LEVEL 2

146

32%

LEVEL 3

45

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

69
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

260

54%

LEVEL 2

152

32%

LEVEL 3

58

12%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

235

50%

LEVEL 2

161

34%

LEVEL 3

60

13%

LEVEL 4

11

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

236

48%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

70

14%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

39

87%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

45

83%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

65
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

97

32%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

163

73%

LEVEL 2

52

23%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

184

76%

LEVEL 2

54

22%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

45

59%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

21

51%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

229

53%

LEVEL 2

149

34%

LEVEL 3

48

11%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

260

51%

LEVEL 2

166

33%

LEVEL 3

66

13%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.