Skip to Content
Main content

GEORGE WASHINGTON SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

77

23%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

91

27%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

68

23%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

39

21%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

43

31%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

28

20%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

6

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

39

45%

LEVEL 4

22

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

18

29%

LEVEL 4

20

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

8

20%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

58

30%

LEVEL 2

68

35%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

63

32%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

63

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

56

21%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

154
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

63

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

52

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

36

73%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

44

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

35

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

62

32%

LEVEL 2

74

38%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

66

34%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.