Skip to Content
Main content

H C CRITTENDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

366
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

106

21%

LEVEL 3

144

29%

LEVEL 4

222

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

85

18%

LEVEL 3

140

30%

LEVEL 4

216

46%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

101

43%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

97

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

200
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

79

30%

LEVEL 4

121

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

193
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

40

16%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

119

47%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

15

71%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

16

73%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

335
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

96

21%

LEVEL 3

132

29%

LEVEL 4

203

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

323
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

77

18%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

190

45%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

10

53%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

74

17%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

216

51%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

65

16%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

212

52%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

27

42%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

14

22%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

104

21%

LEVEL 3

140

29%

LEVEL 4

220

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

348
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

82

18%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

212

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

4

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.