Skip to Content
Main content

ISAAC E YOUNG MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,084

LEVEL 1

398

37%

LEVEL 2

429

40%

LEVEL 3

176

16%

LEVEL 4

81

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

266

41%

LEVEL 2

188

29%

LEVEL 3

128

20%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

168

34%

LEVEL 2

204

41%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

37

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

108

39%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

130
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

230

39%

LEVEL 2

225

38%

LEVEL 3

86

15%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

158

43%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

61

17%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

32
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

38

32%

LEVEL 2

48

41%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

13

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

96

42%

LEVEL 2

85

37%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

47

39%

LEVEL 2

37

31%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

155
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

254

36%

LEVEL 2

289

41%

LEVEL 3

112

16%

LEVEL 4

43

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

192

46%

LEVEL 2

125

30%

LEVEL 3

73

17%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 953

LEVEL 1

287

30%

LEVEL 2

409

43%

LEVEL 3

176

18%

LEVEL 4

81

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

186

34%

LEVEL 2

172

32%

LEVEL 3

128

23%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

111

85%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

80

82%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

255
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 962

LEVEL 1

306

32%

LEVEL 2

401

42%

LEVEL 3

174

18%

LEVEL 4

81

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

193

35%

LEVEL 2

168

31%

LEVEL 3

127

23%

LEVEL 4

59

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

92

75%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

73

77%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

96

32%

LEVEL 2

113

37%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

67

33%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

302

39%

LEVEL 2

316

40%

LEVEL 3

118

15%

LEVEL 4

46

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

199

46%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

76

17%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.