Skip to Content
Main content

TRINITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

64

21%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

206
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

89

22%

LEVEL 2

115

28%

LEVEL 3

138

34%

LEVEL 4

68

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

52

25%

LEVEL 2

53

25%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

23

39%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

27

40%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

40
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

29

30%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

41

29%

LEVEL 3

42

30%

LEVEL 4

25

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

101
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

34

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

92

36%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

132

37%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

32

62%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

32

59%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

196
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

65

18%

LEVEL 2

99

28%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

67

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

24

48%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

45

42%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

17

12%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

54

37%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

35

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.