Skip to Content
Main content

HARRISON AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

89

39%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

98

42%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

44

37%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

47

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

45

41%

LEVEL 4

33

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

45

39%

LEVEL 4

51

44%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

42
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

28

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

65

38%

LEVEL 4

50

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

35

20%

LEVEL 3

63

37%

LEVEL 4

66

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

84

39%

LEVEL 4

66

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

96

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

139
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

60

29%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

157
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

86

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

10

42%

LEVEL 4

6

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

12

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

150
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

84

38%

LEVEL 4

66

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

79

36%

LEVEL 4

95

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.