Skip to Content
Main content

IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

75

22%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

133

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

114

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

61

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

49

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

72

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

65

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

17

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

21

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

186
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

86

34%

LEVEL 4

100

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

81

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

128

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

66

24%

LEVEL 3

88

32%

LEVEL 4

110

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

227
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

125

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

107

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

8

27%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

7

26%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.