Skip to Content
Main content

JOHN JAY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

493
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 772

LEVEL 1

54

7%

LEVEL 2

225

29%

LEVEL 3

310

40%

LEVEL 4

183

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

452
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 627

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

131

21%

LEVEL 3

237

38%

LEVEL 4

215

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

246
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

159

40%

LEVEL 4

87

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

70

22%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

108

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

247
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

151

41%

LEVEL 4

96

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

229
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

122

39%

LEVEL 4

107

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

14

44%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

21
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

10

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

426
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 655

LEVEL 1

40

6%

LEVEL 2

189

29%

LEVEL 3

272

42%

LEVEL 4

154

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

388
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

110

21%

LEVEL 3

206

39%

LEVEL 4

182

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

11

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

11

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

472
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

13

2%

LEVEL 2

166

25%

LEVEL 3

293

45%

LEVEL 4

179

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

430
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

12

2%

LEVEL 2

88

17%

LEVEL 3

220

42%

LEVEL 4

210

40%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

41

34%

LEVEL 2

59

49%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

43

44%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

486
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 747

LEVEL 1

44

6%

LEVEL 2

217

29%

LEVEL 3

304

41%

LEVEL 4

182

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

444
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

36

6%

LEVEL 2

120

20%

LEVEL 3

233

39%

LEVEL 4

211

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.