NORTH ROSE-WOLCOTT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

197

39%

LEVEL 2

163

33%

LEVEL 3

97

19%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

184

43%

LEVEL 2

141

33%

LEVEL 3

70

16%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

100

37%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

90

40%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

97

42%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

94

46%

LEVEL 2

57

28%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

170

38%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

147

39%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

66

18%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

140

32%

LEVEL 2

154

36%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

43

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

124

34%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

57

84%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

60

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

193

39%

LEVEL 2

162

33%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

178

42%

LEVEL 2

141

33%

LEVEL 3

68

16%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

63

44%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

149

46%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

162

57%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

33

12%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

137
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

193

39%

LEVEL 2

161

33%

LEVEL 3

94

19%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

104
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

179

42%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

70

17%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.