GANANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

110

24%

LEVEL 2

182

39%

LEVEL 3

134

29%

LEVEL 4

38

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

89

28%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

99

44%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

64

27%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

92

23%

LEVEL 2

161

40%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

52

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

78

18%

LEVEL 2

179

42%

LEVEL 3

134

31%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

60

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

32

89%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

18

72%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

133

39%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

143
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

94

41%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

47

37%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

28

22%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

27

31%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

21

24%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.