Skip to Content
Main content

PALMYRA-MACEDON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 777

LEVEL 1

179

23%

LEVEL 2

332

43%

LEVEL 3

195

25%

LEVEL 4

71

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

169

27%

LEVEL 2

235

37%

LEVEL 3

161

25%

LEVEL 4

69

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

178

46%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

102

26%

LEVEL 2

154

39%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

88

26%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

248
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

160

22%

LEVEL 2

305

43%

LEVEL 3

182

26%

LEVEL 4

66

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

215
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

143

25%

LEVEL 2

215

38%

LEVEL 3

149

26%

LEVEL 4

66

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

16

57%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 668

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

306

46%

LEVEL 3

190

28%

LEVEL 4

71

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

107

19%

LEVEL 2

218

39%

LEVEL 3

159

29%

LEVEL 4

69

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

78

72%

LEVEL 2

26

24%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

62

77%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

60

13%

LEVEL 2

201

43%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

113

32%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

119

38%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

109

39%

LEVEL 2

109

39%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.