Skip to Content
Main content

NEWARK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 877

LEVEL 1

377

43%

LEVEL 2

310

35%

LEVEL 3

133

15%

LEVEL 4

57

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

236

40%

LEVEL 2

201

34%

LEVEL 3

109

18%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

175

41%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

202

44%

LEVEL 2

162

36%

LEVEL 3

62

14%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

126

40%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

16

34%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

246

39%

LEVEL 2

232

36%

LEVEL 3

109

17%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

156

35%

LEVEL 2

155

35%

LEVEL 3

88

20%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

46

61%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

23

62%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

55

51%

LEVEL 2

35

33%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

40

48%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 782

LEVEL 1

289

37%

LEVEL 2

305

39%

LEVEL 3

132

17%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

163

32%

LEVEL 2

194

38%

LEVEL 3

109

21%

LEVEL 4

49

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

88

93%

LEVEL 2

5

5%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

73

90%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

190
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 859

LEVEL 1

365

42%

LEVEL 2

304

35%

LEVEL 3

133

15%

LEVEL 4

57

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

159
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

229

39%

LEVEL 2

200

34%

LEVEL 3

109

19%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

105

30%

LEVEL 2

138

39%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

63

27%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

59

25%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

272

52%

LEVEL 2

172

33%

LEVEL 3

64

12%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

173

48%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

159
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

233

39%

LEVEL 2

199

34%

LEVEL 3

109

18%

LEVEL 4

50

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.