Skip to Content
Main content

CAMBRIDGE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

142

38%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

131

39%

LEVEL 3

102

30%

LEVEL 4

51

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

50

32%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

48

35%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

61

30%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

126

39%

LEVEL 3

97

30%

LEVEL 4

49

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

132

40%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

115

39%

LEVEL 3

96

33%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

21

48%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

75

33%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

69

32%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

58

41%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

53

43%

LEVEL 3

33

27%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.