Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM H BARTON INTERMEDIATE SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

101

20%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

156

31%

LEVEL 4

98

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

75

17%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

115

26%

LEVEL 4

109

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

46

19%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

55

20%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

90

19%

LEVEL 2

138

29%

LEVEL 3

150

32%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

101

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

153

35%

LEVEL 4

97

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

124

33%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

108

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

44

68%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

41

73%

LEVEL 2

13

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

129

35%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

80

28%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

92

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

58

41%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

51

34%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.