ONTEORA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

101

19%

LEVEL 2

204

39%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

66

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

48

26%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

100

42%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

38

45%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

27

27%

LEVEL 2

31

31%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

187
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

70

17%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

131

31%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

18

37%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

167

41%

LEVEL 3

142

34%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

57

40%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

61

56%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

27

64%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

215
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

91

18%

LEVEL 2

203

40%

LEVEL 3

150

29%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

72
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

66

38%

LEVEL 3

47

27%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

10

83%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

109

39%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

30

34%

LEVEL 4

19

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

65

27%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

62

26%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.