HIGHLAND CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

209

34%

LEVEL 2

235

38%

LEVEL 3

106

17%

LEVEL 4

61

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

77

21%

LEVEL 4

43

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

90

29%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

75

41%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

119

40%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

40

13%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

52

29%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

8

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

12

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

152

33%

LEVEL 2

176

39%

LEVEL 3

85

19%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

71

31%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

21

55%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

13

54%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

28

42%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

30

46%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

141

26%

LEVEL 2

229

43%

LEVEL 3

104

19%

LEVEL 4

61

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

77

24%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

42

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

68

89%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

38

88%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

33

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

109

45%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

51

34%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.