Skip to Content
Main content

HIGHLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

91

28%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

46

26%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

43

40%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

45

30%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

26

17%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

19

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

97

40%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

18

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

10

63%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

16

43%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

62

21%

LEVEL 2

125

43%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

14

82%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

41

20%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

32

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

37

37%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

53

41%

LEVEL 3

17

13%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

30

34%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

15

17%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.