Skip to Content
Main content

J WATSON BAILEY MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 723

LEVEL 1

295

41%

LEVEL 2

279

39%

LEVEL 3

116

16%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

191

42%

LEVEL 2

164

36%

LEVEL 3

66

14%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

77

40%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

162

41%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

62

16%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

114

44%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

12

43%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

117
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

181

42%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

83

34%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

60

56%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

33

50%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

80

63%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

60

62%

LEVEL 2

31

32%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

175

31%

LEVEL 2

243

43%

LEVEL 3

109

19%

LEVEL 4

33

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

146

42%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

120

74%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

89

82%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

267

39%

LEVEL 2

275

40%

LEVEL 3

115

17%

LEVEL 4

33

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

153

37%

LEVEL 2

161

39%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

28

85%

LEVEL 2

4

12%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

38

93%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

150

44%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

85

43%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

212

56%

LEVEL 2

129

34%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

151

59%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.