Skip to Content
Main content

LANSING MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

30

34%

LEVEL 3

31

35%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

36

30%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

35

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

113

42%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

45

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

26

67%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

30

13%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

37

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

28

38%

LEVEL 2

34

47%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

21

47%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.