Skip to Content
Main content

DRYDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 780

LEVEL 1

297

38%

LEVEL 2

270

35%

LEVEL 3

143

18%

LEVEL 4

70

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

187

35%

LEVEL 2

179

34%

LEVEL 3

119

22%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

134

36%

LEVEL 2

141

38%

LEVEL 3

63

17%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

90

34%

LEVEL 2

97

36%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

163

40%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

97

36%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

195
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 715

LEVEL 1

265

37%

LEVEL 2

255

36%

LEVEL 3

133

19%

LEVEL 4

62

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

172

35%

LEVEL 2

168

34%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

42

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 647

LEVEL 1

181

28%

LEVEL 2

255

39%

LEVEL 3

141

22%

LEVEL 4

70

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

109

25%

LEVEL 2

163

37%

LEVEL 3

119

27%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

116

87%

LEVEL 2

15

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

78

83%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 775

LEVEL 1

294

38%

LEVEL 2

268

35%

LEVEL 3

143

18%

LEVEL 4

70

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

101

25%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

98

25%

LEVEL 4

60

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

59

21%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

86

31%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

196

51%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

128

50%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.