Skip to Content
Main content

SPENCER-VAN ETTEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

143

35%

LEVEL 2

167

41%

LEVEL 3

66

16%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

103

30%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

65

33%

LEVEL 2

88

45%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

64

40%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

89
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

138

36%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

112
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

99

30%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

69

21%

LEVEL 4

43

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

92
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

92

27%

LEVEL 2

160

47%

LEVEL 3

63

18%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

118

40%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

51

84%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

42

86%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

72

43%

LEVEL 3

36

21%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

32

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

103

44%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

76

40%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

28

15%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.