Skip to Content
Main content

WAVERLY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

210

30%

LEVEL 2

292

41%

LEVEL 3

139

20%

LEVEL 4

66

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

192

30%

LEVEL 2

239

37%

LEVEL 3

148

23%

LEVEL 4

62

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

77

22%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

98

31%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

108

31%

LEVEL 2

148

42%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

78

24%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

198
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 685

LEVEL 1

203

30%

LEVEL 2

284

41%

LEVEL 3

138

20%

LEVEL 4

60

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

205
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 624

LEVEL 1

185

30%

LEVEL 2

234

38%

LEVEL 3

145

23%

LEVEL 4

60

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

200
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 601

LEVEL 1

133

22%

LEVEL 2

268

45%

LEVEL 3

134

22%

LEVEL 4

66

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

118

21%

LEVEL 2

233

42%

LEVEL 3

143

26%

LEVEL 4

60

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

77

73%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

74

85%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

69

21%

LEVEL 2

135

41%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

141

37%

LEVEL 2

157

42%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

137

39%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.