Skip to Content
Main content

BENJAMIN COSOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

160

43%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

125

40%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

71

43%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

89

43%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

68

41%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

61

42%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

21

23%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

77

46%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

72

42%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

102

33%

LEVEL 2

119

39%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

86

33%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

58

94%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

39

80%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

59

18%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

86
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

91

35%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

34

68%

LEVEL 2

13

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

28

33%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

18

28%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

16

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

132

46%

LEVEL 2

99

34%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

107

43%

LEVEL 2

80

32%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

88
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

156

43%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

58

16%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

87
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

113

39%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.