KINGS PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

730
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,467

LEVEL 1

214

15%

LEVEL 2

523

36%

LEVEL 3

460

31%

LEVEL 4

270

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

411
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 707

LEVEL 1

70

10%

LEVEL 2

226

32%

LEVEL 3

252

36%

LEVEL 4

159

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

356
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 710

LEVEL 1

95

13%

LEVEL 2

259

36%

LEVEL 3

230

32%

LEVEL 4

126

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

215
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

374
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 757

LEVEL 1

119

16%

LEVEL 2

264

35%

LEVEL 3

230

30%

LEVEL 4

144

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

196
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

78

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

33
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

21

47%

LEVEL 4

12

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

25
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

14

41%

LEVEL 4

11

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

671
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,349

LEVEL 1

193

14%

LEVEL 2

485

36%

LEVEL 3

421

31%

LEVEL 4

250

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

364
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

59

10%

LEVEL 2

197

32%

LEVEL 3

227

37%

LEVEL 4

137

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

17

28%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

20

47%

LEVEL 3

9

21%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

704
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,216

LEVEL 1

80

7%

LEVEL 2

432

36%

LEVEL 3

437

36%

LEVEL 4

267

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

403
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

189

30%

LEVEL 3

246

40%

LEVEL 4

157

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

134

53%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

23

9%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

41

48%

LEVEL 2

37

43%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

729
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,456

LEVEL 1

206

14%

LEVEL 2

521

36%

LEVEL 3

459

32%

LEVEL 4

270

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

411
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 701

LEVEL 1

66

9%

LEVEL 2

224

32%

LEVEL 3

252

36%

LEVEL 4

159

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

699
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,378

LEVEL 1

188

14%

LEVEL 2

491

36%

LEVEL 3

436

32%

LEVEL 4

263

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

385
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 640

LEVEL 1

52

8%

LEVEL 2

203

32%

LEVEL 3

236

37%

LEVEL 4

149

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

32

36%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

18

27%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.