Skip to Content
Main content

R J O INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

62

12%

LEVEL 2

171

33%

LEVEL 3

163

31%

LEVEL 4

123

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

65

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

55

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

35

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

68

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

48

38%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

267
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

153

32%

LEVEL 4

114

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

31

7%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

155

35%

LEVEL 4

122

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

94

42%

LEVEL 4

64

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

31

44%

LEVEL 2

30

43%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

18

60%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

285
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

170

33%

LEVEL 3

162

32%

LEVEL 4

123

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

278
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

157

32%

LEVEL 4

121

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

91

39%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

10

42%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

5

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.