Skip to Content
Main content

OAK PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

206

46%

LEVEL 2

159

36%

LEVEL 3

63

14%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

99

41%

LEVEL 2

87

36%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

101

46%

LEVEL 2

76

35%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

50

39%

LEVEL 2

50

39%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

105

47%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

49

43%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

28

49%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

10

34%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

161

46%

LEVEL 2

127

37%

LEVEL 3

48

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

78

41%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

149

40%

LEVEL 2

152

40%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

62

31%

LEVEL 2

81

41%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

57

85%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

37

86%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

71
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

79

32%

LEVEL 2

99

40%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

42

29%

LEVEL 2

58

39%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

127

65%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

8

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

57

59%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

194

47%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

59

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.